NPLens · Design system

Styleguide

The data-viz-forward component library powering NPLens — “authoritative data intelligence.” Every figure is tabular and cites its source; derived metrics are labeled as analysis.

Color

Near-black ink on warm off-white, one confident primary, and careful sequential / diverging ramps for percentile & heat displays.

ink

ink-muted

surface-sunken

border

primary

primary-subtle

positive

negative

warning

Sequential (percentile / heat)

Diverging (below ↔ above benchmark)

Categorical (series)

Typography

Geist for UI, tabular figures for money, monospace for EINs and IDs.

See how any nonprofit really performs

Body — analytical, trustworthy, numbers-forward.

$6,700,000

EIN 53-0196605 · object_id 20241234

Buttons

Badges

neutralprimaryhealthyoutlierwatch

Stat cards (KPIs)

Each figure carries its source filing — attribution is built into the component.

Total revenue

$6.7M

+11.7%YoY

FY2024 Form 990

Program ratio

84%

+2 ptsvs. FY23

Derived · FY2024

Months of cash

6.4

−0.8reserves

Derived · FY2024

Time series

Multi-year financials.

Revenue vs. expenses

FY2020–FY2024 · derived from annual 990 filings

$0$2M$4M$6MFY20FY21FY22FY23FY24Revenue · FY20: $4.2MRevenue · FY21: $4.8MRevenue · FY22: $5.1MRevenue · FY23: $6MRevenue · FY24: $6.7MExpenses · FY20: $3.9MExpenses · FY21: $4.3MExpenses · FY22: $5MExpenses · FY23: $5.4MExpenses · FY24: $6.1M
RevenueExpenses

Bar charts

Peer comparison (highlight one) and distributions.

Top officer comp vs. peers

NTEE B · $5–10M cohort

Peer C
$312K
Peer A
$245K
This org
$198K
Peer B
$176K
Peer D
$154K

Cohort size distribution

Orgs by total-revenue band

<1M: 8<1M1–5M: 211–5M5–10M: 145–10M10–25M: 910–25M25M+: 425M+

Percentile & health

Where an org sits vs. peers, and a composite scorecard. Derived analysis — not official IRS designations.

Program-expense ratio84%
78th percentileNTEE B · $5–10M
Fundraising efficiency$0.12/$1
69th percentilevs. peers
Admin overhead11%
42nd percentilevs. peers
72/ 100

Financial health

B+

Derived analysis — not an official IRS designation.

Program-expense ratio84%
78th percentileNTEE B · $5–10M
Months of cash6.4
61st percentilevs. peers
Fundraising efficiency$0.12 / $1
69th percentilevs. peers

Computed from FY2024 Form 990 · methodology linked on each metric

States

Loading and empty.

No e-file data for this org

This organization appears to have filed on paper only. We show what's available and link the source.

Interactive

Tabs, modal, toast, combobox, the data-dense table, and the grant-flow network.

Tabs

Multi-year revenue, expenses, and reserves.

Modal & Toast

Org search (combobox)

Data table — sortable · filterable · paginated · virtualized

Sample Nonprofit 32
130127069
$12.5M
67%
3rd
Sample Nonprofit 21
130081980
$12.4M
60%
60th
Sample Nonprofit 10
130036891
$12.3M
88%
17th
Sample Nonprofit 41
130163960
$11.5M
60%
20th
Sample Nonprofit 30
130118871
$11.3M
88%
77th
Sample Nonprofit 19
130073782
$11.2M
81%
34th
Sample Nonprofit 8
130028693
$11.1M
74%
91st
Sample Nonprofit 39
130155762
$10.2M
81%
94th
Sample Nonprofit 28
130110673
$10.1M
74%
51st
Sample Nonprofit 17
130065584
$10M
67%
8th
Sample Nonprofit 6
130020495
$9.8M
60%
65th
Sample Nonprofit 37
130147564
$9M
67%
68th
112 of 42
1/4

Grant-flow network (funder → grantee)

$8.0M · journalism$5.0M · access to justice$6.0M$4.0M$5.0M$3.0M$2.0M$3.0M regrant$2.0M regrantFord FoundationMacArthur FoundationHewlett FoundationProPublicaRegional Food BankLegal Aid SocietyCommunity FundCommunity FundCity Arts Collective
FunderGranteeBoth· hover a node to trace its grants