Peer benchmarking
Environment cohort
28 organizations · FY2023 · health-score distribution and per-org efficiency. Derived analysis.
Median health
81
P25
69
P75
92
Top
100
Cohort n
28
Mississippi Land Trust
MS
$1.7M
89%
100
Hunterdon Land Trust
NJ
$1.3M
20.1%
100
Whatcom Land Trust
WA
$1.9M
39.6%
99
Placer Land Trust
CA
$4.4M
63.9%
99
Skagit Land Trust
WA
$4.4M
60.9%
99
Conservation Foundation
IL
$5.7M
39.1%
96
Shasta Land Trust
CA
$9.2M
14.2%
94
Columbia Land Trust
WA
$22.1M
61.2%
92
Minnesota Land Trust
MN
$18.9M
1.8%
89
Conservation Allies
VA
$2.3M
8%
89
World Wildlife Fund Inc
DC
$372.8M
5.3%
87
Capitol Land Trust
WA
$3.1M
57.9%
86
Ag Land Trust
CA
$2.6M
75.3%
84
Ecolife Conservation
CA
$1.9M
18.4%
81
Conservation Nw
WA
$3.4M
0.4%
80
1–15 of 28
1/2
Build your own cohort Pro / Business
Define peer sets by NTEE, revenue band, geography, or a hand-picked EIN list — then export the list and benchmarks.
Percentiles place an org at the 73rd, 50th, etc. within its cohort — derived from the distribution above, not an IRS figure.